Klocwork product documentation is available here.
The value of peer code review is undeniable. But despite this, it continues to be a much-maligned milestone in the software development cycle. Code reviews are difficult to implement consistently, the review is often ... More
Software teams are moving away from single processor architectures at a rapid rate. But the realities of developing software for these next-gen architectures is introducing significant complexity when it comes to ... More
To ensure your embedded software is secure, you must start by understanding the threats that can make it susceptible to attack and then establish appropriate counter measures. Designed for embedded software engineers ... More
This exclusive report, using data from VDC Research's 2010 Embedded Engineering Survey, highlights the new realities of developing software for multicore and multiprocessor architectures. Get the report and learn how growth in these advanced platforms is introducing a new set of challenges for embedded software engineering teams, impacting project schedules, and causing cost overruns.
Embedded software development teams are striving to meet growing market demands while juggling increased software complexity across globally distributed teams. Nowhere are these challenges more amplified than in the medical device sector, where resources are limited, yet code complexity is growing at one of the fastest rates in the industry.
Software coding defects increase the cost of development and support, tarnish a company's reputation, and limit revenue opportunities. This research report from the New Rowley Group discusses how investing in a defect detection and prevention solution enables companies to catch defects early, limit their financial impact, and institute a proactive approach to defect prevention.
This exclusive study commissioned by Klocwork and conducted by Forrester Consulting provides valuable data and insights that will help you benchmark and improve your peer code review practices, including: top code review challenges; respondent's feedback on code review benefits, frequency, and technologies; and recommendations on modernizing code reviews.